
Compiled by Brendan Wissinger
For my next blog post I am going to talk about Climate Change and National Security and Conflict. The US Department of Defense calls climate change a “threat multiplier.” This is the possibly the deadliest impact of Climate Change. In this I will explain the current and future amplifications of this and how Climate Change amplifies war.
Let’s again take a trip around the world, let’s first start in Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia. Its home to the US Atlantic Fleet. But is under threat by sea level rise. Over the last 10 years the shipyard on the naval base has faced nine major floods. The flooding is getting worse. The aftermath of Hurricane Matthew caused $1.2 million in repairs. And Hurricane Matthew didn’t directly hit the naval base. The vital Dry Docks are at risk of being damaged. Currently the flooding at high tide, is causing delays in ship repairs. Next let’s go to the Arctic Ocean where melting sea ice opens up the US to new vulnerabilities with its adversary, Russia. The melting ice makes the waters more able to be navigated. Which creates new shipping areas, which must be protected and it opens up a new front on the current second cold war with Russia. This means the US military needs to invest in a buildup of military forces in the region. Russia and China are already investing to exploit this new front (Dire Pedictions and Age of Consequences). Across the world in Syria, an ongoing civil war that has killed 511,000 people and displaced 12.2 million people. The war has 4 sides, the Syrian Kurds, and Free Syrian Army, the totalitarian Syrian Government and the terrorist group ISIS. Throughout the war different groups have moved from side to side and fought different groups. Parts of the Free Syrian Army have allied with the Kurds to form a rebel state called Rojava who was gaining a significant foothold until a new Turkish backed Free Syrian Army started taking ground from them. The evil terrorist group ISIS or ISIL or Daesh is fighting every other group in the war and every other group is fighting them including other Jihadist terrorist groups, and internationally many countries have intervened to help other groups quash the terrorist group territorially. Meanwhile the totalitarian Syrian Government which does chemical warfare on its own civilians has taken back much of its territory with the aid of Russia and Iran (hrw, and rfi ). The war started after a 10 year famine, caused by drought, which has been attributed to partly being caused by Climate Change pushed the society to collapse, by destroying agriculture driving farming Syrians to cities where food prices were high and their was no employment causing citizens to rebel against its totalitarian government, setting fire to an already fragile state. Next on our places to visit is the War in Darfur, in Sudan. This war and genocide started with a drought partly attributed to Climate Change which pushed non-Arab people of the western region of Sudan, Darfur, to their breaking point, and the revolted against the tyrannical government of Sudan, which then sent Arab militias or the Janjaweed to kill and rape civilians (as well as fighting the Non-Arab Rebels) and prevented international aid from coming to the region. The conflict and related crisises killed hundreds of thousands and displaced 2 million people. This occurs in a region where rainfall has gone down by 30% over the past 40 years causing the Sahara desert to move into the region partly because of climate change. Other conflicts that may be influenced by Climate Change may include South Sudan Civil War, Yemen Civil War, the ISIS Invasion of Iraq and the Libyan Civil War.
The US Department of Defense calls Climate Change a “threat multiplier” meaning it makes conflict more likely to happen and more deadly. Though Climate Change itself doesn’t necessarily cause conflict by itself. You might ask how Climate Change amplifies wars. It does this in several ways. First it does this by creating a lack of resources for example water, food and fertile land or land than isn’t underwater. This can cause wars over these resources as their may not be enough resources to provide for people’s needs. Climate Change causes drought and desertification and glacial melting leading to dwindling fertile land and less water supplies, which countries may fight over to obtain. This will exacerbated environmental refugees that I talk about coming up. Another way Climate Change can cause wars is by stressing an already stressed society to collapse through famines, droughts, economic collapses, sea level rise. Each of these are made more likely by Climate Change which can be the final straw then can push poor countries with corrupt or totalitarian governments into chaos (Age of Consequences). It can end liveihoods, cause people not to have their needs to survive, at which point they will fight to survive (theyearsproject). Climate Change can cause humanitarian crises which can lead to fights for the limited resources now available as supply chains and support systems have broken down, this is made worse when people move to new regions which may aggravate already stressed populations (Age of Consequences). For example like in Syria, a drought can lead to loss of liveihoods, leading to people moving to cities where their already is a food shortage and they are unemployed, leading to Civil Unrest, a lot of desperate and angry people leads to rebellion, and sometimes terrorism. And those terrorist groups may attack us. Climate Change is not the single cause of any war, but it is part of a series of causes that causes any war (Age of Consequences). Also global trade can be affected by Climate Change, in 2010 when Russia and China were hit be severe heatwaves devastated wheat crops, driving up the price of bread, leading to unrest in regions like Egypt as they were too poor to buy the higher prices. Another reason for instability is special circumstances for example Climate Change causing melting Arctic Sea Ice will open up new trade routes where we will be competing with Russia, securing those trade routes requires military resources to be place their when there are also other places they can be used. Another is drought in Afghanistan is causing the population to grow more drought resistant but illegal crops, poppies, which terrorists groups have used to profit off of and grow by allowing farmers to grow poppies. Sea Level Rise, will cause people to become Environmental Refugees to be displaced and move inland where they will compete with inland populations possibly leading to tension, which may lead to conflict. And immigrant tensions rise and it will get worse as resources dwindle due to Climate Change. The poor will not get those resources, the rich will increasing the chance for conflict (Age of Consequences). Sea Level Rise is also flooding the home of America’s Atlantic fleet in Norfolk, Virginia. Another example is more natural disasters when natural disasters happen supply chains may break down and there may not be enough emergency supplies to give to the whole population, leading to unrest (Age of Consequences). In addition to Sea Level Rise environmental refugees, or people forced from their homes because of environmental conditions, may be caused by drought and desertification, for example in the Sahel where environmental refugees are leaving because of drought and heading north, dangerously crossing the Sahara, and then even more dangerously crossing the Mediterranean to Europe. These people feel they have no other choice so they will do this. Large populations with no food, water or permanent shelter, leads to instability and conflict. And really most immigrants are refugees, as economic reasons for leaving and environmental and security reasons usually get tied up together. As droughts and floods get worse and especially Sea Level Rise gets worse, these conflicts will get worse (Age of Consequences). Another reason why more people may die of war because of Climate Change is hotter temperatures causes stress, causing more battles and more gunfire and more deaths. Finally Mitigating Climate Change would stop our reliance on Oil, then we would not have to have close relationships with and secure fragile states and tyrannical states for example Iraq and Saudi Arabia (Age of Consequences).
With increasing temperatures Climate Change’s deadly influence on conflict will only get worse unless we mitigate emissions immediately. I cannot give specific numbers on how worse but I can give examples on how it will get worse. First let’s go to the Indian Subcontinent. This region is ripe for problems from Climate Change. There is already tension in the region between the nuclear powers of Pakistan and India with China taking Pakistan’s side. India and Pakistan already have high tensions over water. Also India wants to free Tibet which under the control of China. Climate Change will make things worse let’s start in Bangladesh where Sea Level Rise and Cyclones is flooding farms in the south which not only hurts crops by the floods themselves but also by erosion and the salt that is brought in. It is ruining liveihoods, and leaving farmers and their families struggling to survive, so they move north as environmental refugees to the city of Dhaka, into unsanitary decrepit slums where flooding still may be prevalent, the live in shacks, with many other people, and children may be pressed into dangerous child labor and child marriages. By 2100, 20% of the country would be submerged at a modest 3 ft of sea level rise. The influx of people is causing people to try to move north to India, but India is building a wall of razor wire with armed guards, who will shoot anyone who crosses the border with them and Bangladesh (The Age of Consequences). To make matters worse, Climate Change is supposed to cause longer droughts, more variable monsoons and more intense monsoons. So their won’t be as many rainfalls but they will be more intense. This causes crops to either be flooded out or dried out, it causes a lack of water for people in India leading to possible conflicts over water resources needed over the longer dry period. Also up in the Himalayas, where many people get their water from glaciers are melting and losing water meaning people are losing access to water when warmer temperatures make them need more water, leading to conflict over resources. Combined with the current tension over Kashmir this region is a powderkeg in the future (The Age of Consequences). Another region of concern is parts of the Middle East could be so hot and so dry they would be inhabitable. This means a lack of resources and more environmental refugees moving to wetter and cooler climates, both of these could cause a lot more war across the Middle East and North Africa. The lack of resources caused by intense rainfall, long droughts, sea level rise and environmental refugees can also increase conflict in Sub-Sahara Africa. Most of the region relies on subsistence agriculture. These factors could push fragile states in the region over the edge. Drought is already affecting the Horn of Africa and the Sahel regions, increasing the likelihood for conflict in the region. Another problem is dwindling fishing supplies could lead to more conflict over fishing grounds and more piracy, this could also play out in the Horn of Africa, where piracy is already a problem. Lastly let’s go to the areas around Russia, as ice melts, Russia will gain access to oil and gas fields, below the ice, giving them more resources, another concern is that if anybody stands to benefit from Climate Change it’s Russia, as agriculture yields could increase there in a warmer climate in Russia, and mineral resources could be opened up by the melting ice. In other ways Climate Change will adversely affect Russia, and there will be more negatives than positives for Russia. But it many stand to lose less than the US, which places Russia on a higher playing field against the United States.
The US Military is the largest buyer of oil in the world. Each year the military acquisitions 100 million barrels to power everything from military bases to tanks to Humvees to aircraft to naval vessels. This itself makes the US military vulnerable as all of that stuff has to be imported using convoys, a big target, and the oil’s price can fluctuate wildly (then again when has the military cared about the cost of something). Recently the US military is trying to change this, by trying to switch to mobile solar panels and wind turbines for military bases which can be used without long supply chains back to home. The Military is doing research into sun powered aircraft and hybrid-engine vehicles and tanks, meanwhile the military is experimenting and using biofuels. The US Armed Forces can’t use battery powered equipment because in a combat zone there is no infrastructure for that, so biofuels and hydrogen are the best answers for the military. The US Armed Forces has a goal to be petroleum free by 2040. The US Air Force has a goal to use biofuels for 50% of its within the US aviation by 2016. By 2025, the Department of Defense says 25% of its facilities must use renewable energy.






























